{"id":15341,"date":"2025-10-31T13:27:58","date_gmt":"2025-10-31T13:27:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/?p=15341"},"modified":"2025-10-31T13:27:58","modified_gmt":"2025-10-31T13:27:58","slug":"trader-brandt-parie-chute-btc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/trader-brandt-parie-chute-btc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin : ce trader l\u00e9gendaire passe short pour la premi\u00e8re fois"},"content":{"rendered":"

Un short assum\u00e9 malgr\u00e9 un bag long terme<\/h2>\n

Dans son message, Brandt dit clairement qu’il trouve \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9routant\u00a0\u00bb de devoir tenir deux id\u00e9es \u00e0 la fois : investisseur long BTC<\/strong> depuis des ann\u00e9es et, en m\u00eame temps, vendeur sur les futures parce que le setup court terme le demande.<\/p>\n

En somme, cette tension entre horizon d’investissement et horizon de trading, c’est ce que vivent beaucoup de desks en ce moment.<\/p>\n

\n

Do others besides me find it a bit awkward intellectually\/emotionally when you hold contrary positions in accounts designed to trade different systems\/time frames?
As an investor I have owned Bitcoin for years
As a swing trader I am now short $BTC<\/a> futures based on megaphone pic.twitter.com\/bZZDwbypSh<\/a><\/p>\n

— Peter Brandt (@PeterLBrandt) October 30, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n