{"id":22171,"date":"2026-05-28T12:49:42","date_gmt":"2026-05-28T12:49:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/?p=22171"},"modified":"2026-05-27T09:55:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T09:55:11","slug":"bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<p>Actualit\u00e9 Bitcoin : Lundi dernier, cinq adresses Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9es le 10 avril 2014 ont simultan\u00e9ment transf\u00e9r\u00e9 un total de 107 BTC, d&rsquo;une valeur d&rsquo;environ 8,2 millions de dollars aux cours actuels, vers la c\u00e9l\u00e8bre adresse de burn <code>1111111111111111111114oLvT2<\/code>. Ce mouvement, rep\u00e9r\u00e9 en premier par l&rsquo;analyste on-chain Sani (SaniExp), retire d\u00e9finitivement ces fonds de l&rsquo;offre en circulation.<\/p>\r\n<p>La synchronisation parfaite, la structure identique des transactions et les param\u00e8tres de verrouillage (locktime) ont imm\u00e9diatement \u00e9cart\u00e9 la th\u00e8se de la co\u00efncidence. Sur X, les observateurs multiplient les th\u00e9ories sur l&rsquo;identit\u00e9 et les motivations de l&rsquo;auteur derri\u00e8re cet acte d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\r\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/05\/content-img-1-15.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\r\n<p>Plus qu&rsquo;un simple myst\u00e8re, cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement semble signaler une sophistication croissante chez les d\u00e9tenteurs de Bitcoin de longue date. Qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agisse d&rsquo;individus, de collectifs ou de syst\u00e8mes automatis\u00e9s, ces acteurs organisent des sorties irr\u00e9versibles du r\u00e9seau. Ici, la m\u00e9canique technique de l&rsquo;op\u00e9ration, particuli\u00e8rement lisible sur la blockchain, importe plus que le mobile lui-m\u00eame.<\/p>\r\n<h2>Bitcoin News Today : Le m\u00e9canisme de burn et les preuves on-chain<\/h2>\r\n<p>Le fonctionnement est simple : une adresse de burn comme <code>1111111111111111111114oLvT2<\/code> (souvent surnomm\u00e9e <em>1BitcoinEater<\/em> par la communaut\u00e9) est un format d&rsquo;adresse valide pour lequel aucune cl\u00e9 priv\u00e9e n&rsquo;existe ni ne peut \u00eatre d\u00e9riv\u00e9e. Par cons\u00e9quent, tout BTC envoy\u00e9 vers celle-ci est prouv\u00e9 comme \u00e9tant d\u00e9finitivement inutilisable selon les r\u00e8gles cryptographiques actuelles de Bitcoin.<\/p>\r\n<p>Les cinq adresses \u00e9mettrices \u2014 <code>16g5hMoREWqMcaQGvnCHCWPheotD99bVQt<\/code>, <code>1PkWqW1P7KsxYXsAnWMPru6NNTfBeiRT6V<\/code>, <code>1LieqLD1qNadbQrSGjYAUT3tVL2w4cxXQu<\/code>, <code>14UNkCVPDQFCZAvq3j4vUQ6h6pHwBtegMa<\/code> et <code>1JtpAuksysZdwzkCjwQpTG5mzE8BRq7qmh<\/code> \u2014 ont chacune vid\u00e9 l&rsquo;int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de leur solde en une seule op\u00e9ration, affichant d\u00e9sormais un solde de z\u00e9ro.<\/p>\r\n<p>Les frais totaux pour ces cinq transactions ne se sont \u00e9lev\u00e9s qu&rsquo;\u00e0 5,56 $, avec un taux de 1,81 sat\/vByte. Les analystes notent toutefois que ce tarif repr\u00e9sentait environ le double des frais en vigueur pour ce bloc, sugg\u00e9rant que l&rsquo;exp\u00e9diteur souhaitait une ex\u00e9cution prioritaire d\u00e8s l&rsquo;expiration du locktime.<\/p>\r\n<p>Chaque transaction partageait le m\u00eame bloc de verrouillage <strong>950 958<\/strong>, le m\u00eame param\u00e8tre Replace-By-Fee et une consolidation multi-UTXO vers une sortie unique. Cette signature technique est caract\u00e9ristique d&rsquo;un pr\u00e9-signage et d&rsquo;une diffusion automatis\u00e9e par un op\u00e9rateur unique, plut\u00f4t que de cinq parties ind\u00e9pendantes agissant de concert.<\/p>\r\n<p>Selon les donn\u00e9es on-chain cit\u00e9es par Protos, l&rsquo;ex\u00e9cution a \u00e9t\u00e9 synchronis\u00e9e \u00e0 la seconde pr\u00e8s. Une analyse de MEXC indique que ce groupe d&rsquo;adresses accumulait des fonds depuis 2014, atteignant un pic de valeur d&rsquo;environ 2,5 millions de dollars fin 2025 avant cette destruction totale.<\/p>\r\n<p><blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"474\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">BTC linked to Mt.Gox were recently sent to BTC burn address<br><br>More than a 100 BTC were sent to 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 that is used as a burn address. Most of the addresses involved were receiving funds linked to Mt.Gox. <br><br>The address on the screenshot got 20 BTC and was\u2026 <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow sponsored\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/6QrToqyRtI\">pic.twitter.com\/6QrToqyRtI<\/a><\/p>&mdash; AMLBot (@AMLBotHQ) <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow sponsored\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AMLBotHQ\/status\/2059240765360853024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">May 26, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\r\n<p>Il convient de rester prudent sur l&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation de certains d\u00e9tails. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&rsquo;analyse blockchain AMLBot a affirm\u00e9 que certains entrants poss\u00e9daient des liens historiques avec l&rsquo;infrastructure de l&rsquo;\u00e9change d\u00e9chu <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AMLBotHQ\/status\/2059240765360853024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\">Mt. Gox<\/a>. Toutefois, elle n&rsquo;a pas identifi\u00e9 l&rsquo;exp\u00e9diteur r\u00e9el, ni li\u00e9 ce mouvement au syndic de faillite de Mt. Gox. \u00c0 ce jour, aucune communication officielle ou document judiciaire n&rsquo;a confirm\u00e9 de lien avec l&rsquo;affaire Mt. Gox.<\/p>\r\n<p>Le motif, l&rsquo;identit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;op\u00e9rateur et l&rsquo;\u00e9l\u00e9ment d\u00e9clencheur de cette diffusion automatis\u00e9e restent inconnus.<\/p>\r\n<p>Ce que le registre on-chain confirme sans ambigu\u00eft\u00e9, c&rsquo;est la destruction : 107 BTC ont \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9s de l&rsquo;offre. L&rsquo;adresse de burn d\u00e9tient d\u00e9sormais 807 Bitcoins, soit environ 61 millions de dollars, devenus d\u00e9finitivement inaccessibles.<\/p><a class=\"infinscroll_next_page_link\" style=\"display:none\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/stand-with-crypto-pousse-pour-le-vote-du-clarity-act\/\" rel=\"prev\">next<\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cinq portefeuilles Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9s en 2014 ont br\u00fbl\u00e9 107 BTC (8,2 M$). D\u00e9couvrez les d\u00e9tails on-chain de cette destruction massive et coordonn\u00e9e.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":200,"featured_media":22169,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actu"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Cinq portefeuilles Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9s en 2014 ont br\u00fbl\u00e9 107 BTC (8,2 M$). Voici les d\u00e9tails on-chain de cette destruction massive et coordonn\u00e9e.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Cinq portefeuilles Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9s en 2014 ont br\u00fbl\u00e9 107 BTC (8,2 M$). Voici les d\u00e9tails on-chain de cette destruction massive et coordonn\u00e9e.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Coinspeaker France\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-28T12:49:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/05\/bitcoin-news-today-107-btc-dormant-burned-mt-gox-rumors-featured.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Emmanuel Roux\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Emmanuel Roux\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn","description":"Cinq portefeuilles Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9s en 2014 ont br\u00fbl\u00e9 107 BTC (8,2 M$). Voici les d\u00e9tails on-chain de cette destruction massive et coordonn\u00e9e.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn","og_description":"Cinq portefeuilles Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9s en 2014 ont br\u00fbl\u00e9 107 BTC (8,2 M$). Voici les d\u00e9tails on-chain de cette destruction massive et coordonn\u00e9e.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/","og_site_name":"Coinspeaker France","article_published_time":"2026-05-28T12:49:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/05\/bitcoin-news-today-107-btc-dormant-burned-mt-gox-rumors-featured.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Emmanuel Roux","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Emmanuel Roux","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/","url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/","name":"Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/05\/bitcoin-news-today-107-btc-dormant-burned-mt-gox-rumors-featured.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-28T12:49:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/cfb5df450a3f98d6cbdac45264af1e5d"},"description":"Cinq portefeuilles Bitcoin cr\u00e9\u00e9s en 2014 ont br\u00fbl\u00e9 107 BTC (8,2 M$). Voici les d\u00e9tails on-chain de cette destruction massive et coordonn\u00e9e.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/05\/bitcoin-news-today-107-btc-dormant-burned-mt-gox-rumors-featured.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2026\/05\/bitcoin-news-today-107-btc-dormant-burned-mt-gox-rumors-featured.jpg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/bitcoin-107-btc-de-2014-detruits-via-une-adresse-de-burn\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bitcoin : 107 BTC de 2014 d\u00e9truits via une adresse de burn"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/","name":"Coinspeaker France","description":"Bitcoin, Ethereum, Altcoins et actualit\u00e9s crypto avec analyses, cours en direct, graphiques de donn\u00e9es et guides","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/cfb5df450a3f98d6cbdac45264af1e5d","name":"Emmanuel Roux","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/06\/cropped-pp-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/06\/cropped-pp-1-96x96.png","caption":"Emmanuel Roux"},"description":"Issu de la finance traditionnelle, j\u2019ai naturellement bascul\u00e9 vers l\u2019univers crypto, attir\u00e9 par son potentiel. Je souhaite y apporter mon approche analytique et rationnelle, tout en conservant ma curiosit\u00e9. En dehors de l\u2019\u00e9cran, je lis beaucoup (\u00e9conomie, essais, un peu de science-fiction) et je prends plaisir \u00e0 bricoler. Le DIY, pour moi, c\u2019est comme la crypto : comprendre, tester, construire soi-m\u00eame.","url":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/author\/emmanuel\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/200"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22171"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22176,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22171\/revisions\/22176"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22169"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}