{"id":6461,"date":"2025-08-18T05:00:35","date_gmt":"2025-08-18T05:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/?p=6461"},"modified":"2025-08-18T07:17:32","modified_gmt":"2025-08-18T07:17:32","slug":"kraken-sevit-perturbations-blockchain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.coinspeaker.com\/fr\/kraken-sevit-perturbations-blockchain\/","title":{"rendered":"Kraken s\u00e9vit encore plus apr\u00e8s des perturbations sur la blockchain : quelle suite ?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Lorsque 51 % du taux de hachage est contr\u00f4l\u00e9, on peut parler de menace<\/strong>. En fait, r\u00e9cemment, Qubic a pris le contr\u00f4le de la majorit\u00e9 de la puissance mini\u00e8re de Monero.<\/p>\n La m\u00e9thode utilis\u00e9e pour l’attaque repose sur le m\u00e9canisme uPoW<\/strong>. Qubic<\/a> a \u00e9galement annonc\u00e9 qu’il r\u00e9cup\u00e9rait la moiti\u00e9 des profits miniers en XMR, les convertissant en USDT pour acheter des tokens QUBIC et les envoyer \u00e0 une adresse de destruction.<\/p>\n A 6 re-org does not mean a '51% attack' was successful. In that case, we'd see unbounded-depth re-orgs\/no blocks mined by any other mining pool (assuming the adversary censors other mining pools, as this one does).<\/p>\n It does mean an adversary with a high amount of hash got lucky.<\/p>\n — Luke Parker (@kayabaNerve) August 12, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n