What Is Blockchain Interoperability? Definition, Meaning, & How It Works

Blockchain Interoperability is the ability of various blockchain networks to communicate with each other, share data, and transfer assets. Many of the largest blockchains today are isolated from other networks, which has a number of downsides, including diminished freedom for users and depressed liquidity and scalability.  However, interoperability can have several downsides as well, such as increased risk of hacks.

Many of today’s most innovative blockchain developers are working on boosting interoperability across the crypto market without harming its security. This is because the crypto market has become more and more fragmented over the years as hundreds of new and unique blockchains are created. If most of these networks are kept totally separate, a massive amount of liquidity will likely be locked up in these individual chains, harming the wider market’s scalability, efficiency, and utility.

In this guide, we will explain the definition of blockchain interoperability, discuss its benefits and limitations, unravel the critical concepts surrounding it, and explore the future of the technology. This concept is vital even for beginner crypto investors to understand, as it seems like it will continue to be a major frontier of the market for the foreseeable future.

What Is Blockchain Interoperability?

Interoperability describes the ability of different blockchains and decentralized applications (dApps) to communicate and interact with one another. Most blockchains are designed as silos, lacking the capability to interact with each other, which poses a series of issues, such as:

• Inefficiency: Users have to go through centralized exchanges or complex workarounds to move funds between chains. This process can be slow, costly, and introduces potentially risky trust in third parties.
• Limited cross-chain utility: Isolation can make it difficult for developers to build apps for multiple blockchains, decreasing the utility of certain blockchains and limiting liquidity.
• Centralization: A dominant and isolated blockchain in the market, such as Bitcoin, can become a single point of failure, contradicting the decentralized ethos.
• User restrictions: A siloed ecosystem reduces user freedom, restricting what they can easily and safely do with their funds.

Despite what many of the most bullish proponents of the crypto market, Satoshi Nakamoto‘s vision of a decentralized financial system still has its share of problems. Fragmentation is one of the most central issues that the market faces today, as it contributes to other major problems like scalability, decentralization, and liquidity.

On the surface, this fragmentation might seem like a relatively easy problem to solve. However, even many of the leading solutions in today’s market are imperfect, requiring significant trade-offs with other ideal elements of a truly open and decentralized ecosystem. For example, connecting separate blockchains may require creating centralized, third-party systems, which can easily become major weak points for bugs or hacks.

Benefits and Limitations of Blockchain Interoperability

Most crypto investors see blockchain interoperability as a purely positive development, and there are many legitimate benefits, but it also comes with a few major risks and limitations. One of the greatest upsides of interoperability between blockchains is increased liquidity.

Interoperability allows more assets and capital to flow freely across blockchains instead of trapping them in one or two silos. It allows investors to more easily find better and larger shared pools, reducing inefficiencies and improving price discovery.

This kind of tech can also help enhance scalability by allowing blockchains to specialize in certain workloads instead of competing for every single blockchain transaction. It enables investors to more easily move their funds to the best blockchains for their purposes, spreading out the workload and reducing fees and congestion across the ecosystem. This is a major driver in the development of interoperability because scalability is still one of the biggest hurdles facing the crypto market today.

Increased interoperability can also spread out the crypto market’s risks by reducing the reliance on any given blockchain. Without it, the market could become too reliant on a single large blockchain, which would cause a disastrous correction if it were ever hacked or faced similarly devastating problems.

While there are certainly some major theoretical benefits in terms of security, some forms of interoperability can actually introduce significant security flaws and risks. First of all, because most blockchains are technologically distinct with unique governance mechanisms, interoperability often requires some kind of external system to connect them, such as third-party validators or bridges.

This doesn’t just diminish the inherent decentralization of the ecosystem; it also introduces a major target for hackers. Billions of dollars have been stolen from crypto bridges over the years, with some of the largest incidents being the Ronin Network exploit (~$600M lost) and BNB Bridge hack (~$570M lost). Even the smallest errors or bugs in the code of these bridges can be absolutely devastating to the entire crypto market.

How Blockchain Interoperability Relates to Other Crypto Topics

Now, let’s explore some related terms and topics that you should know about.

The Blockchain Trilemma

One of the most important and relevant concepts to mention when discussing interoperability is the blockchain trilemma. The blockchain trilemma is the challenge of balancing three critical aspects of public blockchains: decentralization, security, and scalability. It can be incredibly difficult (but not impossible) to improve one of these elements without sacrificing another, limiting developers from achieving high levels of all three simultaneously.

This concept is central to the interoperability problem because many of the leading solutions in the market today absolutely have trade-offs in terms of security or decentralization. Third-party bridges are a common example. They can help boost scalability by spreading transactions across various blockchains, but they can also concentrate power in a trusted party and become major targets for hacks and bugs. Ideally, the crypto market wouldn’t require its users to trust a centralized authority, but this can be extraordinarily difficult to implement with interoperability tech.

What Is Omnichain?

Omnichain refers to the goal of connecting all major blockchains, regardless of their underlying smart contract technology. Essentially, it is the end goal of all of the work being done to improve interoperability in the crypto market.

Omnichain is a relatively broad term that can be used in a number of ways. To some, it’s simply a basic approach to build a better-connected blockchain ecosystem. To others, it’s a more specific technical goal that aims to create a base layer (often known as Layer Zero) that serves as foundational infrastructure that enables interoperability between chains.

Ideally, all major blockchain networks and dApps may someday be able to seamlessly integrate into this base layer. This would allow fast and easy asset transfers across networks as well as comprehensive data sharing. If it is built using a secure, decentralized governance system, it could help eliminate some of the risks introduced by other interoperability solutions like third-party bridges.

What Is Multichain?

Multichain is another important concept to understand in terms of interoperability. Blockchains, assets, or applications that are deployed across multiple chains are described as multichain. However, because of the differing governance systems and technical differences, they usually have to be deployed and operated separately.

This is one of the most common kinds of interoperability in the crypto network because it is generally easier to develop, requires less new infrastructure, and doesn’t always require trusted third parties. Nevertheless, it simply isn’t an option for many apps, assets, and protocols that are too dissimilar from one another.

Most multichain applications are launched on blockchains that use the same or very similar smart contract technology, which makes it vastly easier for developers to reuse code with minimal changes. For example, many new networks, such as BNB Smart Chain and Polygon, are built to be compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), which allows developers to easily port their Ethereum-based apps to the new chains.

What Is Cross-Chain?

Cross-chain technology facilitates communication and exchange of information and digital assets between independent blockchains, essentially acting as a bridge for data and tokens between isolated ecosystems. This approach is unique from multichain tech because these systems are actively connecting blockchains so that they can interact with each other. On the other hand, multichain tech offers roughly the same utility across networks but is deployed and operated separately.

One of the most important forms of this kind of interoperability tech is the cross-chain bridge. These smart contract protocols typically lock the original assets in a pool on one blockchain and issue synthetic tokens of equivalent value on the other chain, enabling asset transfers.

For example, if someone owns one Bitcoin (BTC) and wants to use it within a DeFi application on the Ethereum network, they can transfer their Bitcoin to a cross-chain bridge. This process locks the BTC and issues one wBTC (an ERC-20 token) on Ethereum in return.

While this has been an important innovation with profound benefits across the crypto market, it is far from perfect. As we discussed earlier in the article, these bridges are some of the biggest targets for massive hacks and exploits. This is due to a few main reasons. Firstly, they often hold a massive amount of tokens. They are also complex, technically-intensive protocols that usually require some level of additional trust in a centralized party. Even the smallest bugs or errors in the code have led to massive, 9-figure hacks in the past.

What Is the Future of Blockchain Interoperability?

Interoperability remains one of the most active areas of research and development in the blockchain space. It has the potential to improve scalability and liquidity throughout the entire crypto world, but it’s also such a difficult and complex concept that it often introduces significant risks and trade-offs.

Perhaps one day developers will be able to build a perfectly interoperable ecosystem that doesn’t suffer from concentration and security vulnerabilities, and Layer Zero tech is already quite promising. However, this isn’t the reality for even the best interoperability solutions in use today. It will likely take many brilliant developers and a staggering amount of work through trial and error to get there. Until then, crypto investors have to keep in mind both the benefits and the downsides of the current state of interoperability tech to get the most out of their digital assets safely.

FAQs

Julia Sakovich

Senior Editor, 1256 posts

See All Articles

I’m a content writer and editor with extensive experience creating high-quality content across a range of industries. Currently, I serve as the Editor-in-Chief at Coinspeaker, where I lead content strategy, oversee editorial workflows, and ensure that every piece meets the highest standards. In this role, I collaborate closely with writers, researchers, and industry experts to deliver content that not only informs and educates but also sparks meaningful discussion around innovation.

Much of my work focuses on blockchain, cryptocurrencies, artificial intelligence, and software development, where I bring together editorial expertise, subject knowledge, and leadership experience to shape meaningful conversations about technology and its real-world impact. I’m particularly passionate about exploring how emerging technologies intersect with business, society, and everyday life. Whether I’m writing about decentralized finance, AI applications, or the latest in software development, my goal is always to make complex subjects accessible, relevant, and valuable to readers.

My academic background has played an important role in shaping my approach to content. I studied Intercultural Communications, PR, and Translation at Minsk State Linguistic University, and later pursued a Master’s degree in Economics and Management at the Belarusian State Economic University. The combination of linguistic, communication, and business training has given me the ability to translate complex technical and economic concepts into clear, engaging narratives for diverse audiences.

Over the years, my articles have been featured on a variety of platforms. In addition to contributing to company blogs—primarily for software development agencies—my work has appeared in well-regarded outlets such as SwissCognitive, HackerNoon, Tech Company News, and SmallBizClub, among others.