Wall Street Refuses to Bank Crypto Businesses, and Here’s Why

It seems these days everybody is writing about JP Morgan, whether attacking Ripple or blacklistling other crypto companies.

Photo: Salim Virji / Flickr

Photo: Salim Virji / Flickr

What is actually happening is that JP Morgan still refuses to bank cryptocurrency businesses. The Wall Street giant even shut down the account of Kraken – one of the world’s largest and most-secure cryptocurrency exchanges.

And while top-tier banks are getting more crypto-curious every day, JPMorgan rolled out a prototype digital coin last month. Not just that. They went so far that they called other cryptocurrencies (especially XRP) “a scam”.

Robby Houben, a lawyer and professor at the University of Antwerp who co-authored a paper for the European Parliament on financial crime involving cryptocurrencies said:

“No bank is willing to help them out. I have met some really stand-up people in crypto that don’t deserve such a bad reputation and want the sector to be regulated, yet for every one of those, there are plenty of others trying to scam the public, launder money or evade taxes.”

Despite Bitcoin coming a long way since its Silk Road days, a one-size-fits-all ban is being implemented by big banks to keep out crypto-companies.

Sam Bankman-Fried, Chief Executive Officer of Alameda Research, a digital-assets trading firm in California said:

“The standard answer of `just go to your local Chase branch’ doesn’t work in crypto. It’s not illegal for big banks to bank the crypto industry, but it’s a massive compliance headache that they don’t want to put the resources in to solve.”

Digital currencies have attracted outlaws since the first one, bitcoin, appeared a decade ago because they obscure the identities of parties in a transaction and operate outside the regulated financial system. From Silk Road, the online drug bazaar shut down by the FBI in 2013, to Russian intelligence officers indicted for hacking offenses related to the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, crypto has been associated with illicit activities.

New Rules and Tougher Standards for Cryptocurrenices

Though legitimate uses have mushroomed in recent years, it’s simpler for banks to maintain a blanket prohibition, said Jerry Brito, executive director of the crypto advocacy group Coin Center in Washington.

Across the world, regulators have been imposing new rules on crypto businesses, subjecting them to tougher standards for derivatives tied to virtual currencies, introducing new licensing requirements or just reminding firms that their newfangled products must comply with securities and banking law. Those warnings are loudest about the need for banks to meet existing rules to fight money-laundering—a compliance task that already costs financial firms some $25 billion a year, according to one estimate.

Anti-money laundering rules typically require banks to know the identity and aims of their clients and often be able to trace the source of their customers’ cash. Building a compliance and monitoring system is expensive and some banks conclude the costs just aren’t worth it.

We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language, all capital letters or appear to be spam, and we review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Coinspeaker Ltd.