Aofex

Ripple Threatens to Leave U.S. Over Excessive Federal Government Crypto Regulation

UTC by Tolu Ajiboye · 3 min read
Ripple Threatens to Leave U.S. Over Excessive Federal Government Crypto Regulation
Photo: Shutterstock

Ripple is considering leaving the U.S. and opting for Asia or Europe instead because of the unfavorable regulatory climate caused by U.S. regulators.

In response to the excessive and unclear regulation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ripple is planning to move overseas. This was revealed by Ripple’s executive chairman Chris Larsen in a virtual interview with Fortune.

Speaking at the LA Blockchain summit on 6th October, Larsen expressed his displeasure with the U.S. regulatory framework for crypto.

“The message is blockchain and digital currencies are not welcome in the US. You want to be in this business, you probably should be going somewhere else. To be honest with you, we’re even looking at relocating our headquarters to a much friendly jurisdiction.”

Ripple Threatens to Leave the U.S.

Notably, the SEC concluded that Bitcoin and Ethereum are not centrally controlled. Hence, the two cryptocurrencies were exempted from securities laws.

According to Larsen, most countries have more favorable regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies than the U.S. He added that regulators like the U.S. SEC negatively impact the digital currency and the blockchain. Specifically, Larsen revealed Ripple’s plan to move to the UK, Switzerland, Singapore, or Japan.

In addition, Larsen noted that moving the firm’s headquarters out of the U.S. does not affect its operation in the country. However, the Ripple executive said a change of chief regulator would be a relief to the fintech firm.

Also, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse commented on the U.S. lack of regulatory clarity.

Ripple’s Lawsuits

Over the past few years, Ripple has faced lawsuits over its XRP token being a security and selling them illegally. In 2018, an investor Ryan Coffey sued Ripple for losing money while buying and selling XRP. At that time, the investor sought damages on behalf of all other investors that purchased the XRP token.

Following the lawsuit, Ripple filed to dismiss the complaint. Highlighting the digital currency’s legal classification, Ripple said that federal regulators have declared XRP as a currency and not a security.

A month before the lawsuit, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said that XRP is not a security. The UK regulator further compared Ethereum to XRP, claiming they have similar features.

Amid the tension between Ripple and the SEC, there is an ongoing debate on the role of central banks and digital currencies. Larsen, along with some other critics, warned that the US may lose its financial innovation to China.

Remarkably, China is leading the race to launch a digital currency. On the 6th of October, the deputy governor of the People’s Bank of China Fan Yifei revealed details on the status of the digital yuan. The central bank said it has processed 3.13 million transactions using the digital currency.

Before now, there have been ongoing pilot tests for the central bank digital currency (CBDC) in some parts of China. Fan revealed that the tests in Shenzhen and Xiongan have made progress.

Altcoin News, Blockchain News, Cryptocurrency news, Editor's Choice, News
Tolu Ajiboye
Author Tolu Ajiboye

Tolu is a cryptocurrency and blockchain enthusiast based in Lagos. He likes to demystify crypto stories to the bare basics so that anyone anywhere can understand without too much background knowledge. When he's not neck-deep in crypto stories, Tolu enjoys music, loves to sing and is an avid movie lover.

Related Articles
By September 17th, 2021
Bitcoin NewsCryptocurrency newsNews Mykola‌ ‌Udianskyi:‌ ‌Bill‌ ‌on‌ ‌Virtual‌ ‌Assets‌ ‌to‌ ‌Give‌ ‌Boost‌ ‌to‌ ‌Ukrainian‌ ‌Crypto‌ ‌Projects by‌ ‌Attracting‌ ‌Foreign‌ ‌Investments
By September 17th, 2021

Ukraine has become the fifth country in the past few weeks to set the ground rules for digital currencies after El Salvador recognized Bitcoin as legal tender on September 7, just a day before the Ukrainian bill was passed.