Nearly a month after Ripple shipped xrpld v3.2.0, the renamed successor to the Ripple Core server software, XRPScan data show that only 357 of 828 total XRP Ledger nodes (43%) have made the switch, while 426 nodes (51%) remain on v3.1.3.
This is not simply a slow rollout. It is a structural illustration of the two-tier governance dynamic that defines XRPL upgrade cycles: validator consensus runs well ahead of the broader node ecosystem, and the network’s functional readiness is determined by the former rather than the latter.
We shipped together with the community (40+ devs and 9 new comers)- XRP Ledger 3.2.0, lots of great protocol improvements including the migration to xrpld.
34% are on 3.2.0 already!
Please update your nodes at your earliest convenience.
This XRP USD data drop came as XRP is trading down -3.5% over the past 24 hours, dropping under $1.10 once more, currently trading at $1.09 with a daily trading volume of $1.54Bn.
With this price drop, $1.10 has once more become resistance for XRP USD, and until this level can be flipped and closed above on the weekly chart, it will continue to act as a sticking point for any larger moves.
$XRP has formed a hidden bearish divergence on the daily timeframe; XRP needs to reclaim $1.15 soon, or things could get ugly with a journey back towards $1.00. pic.twitter.com/YXzlS0xDi5
XRPL Node Adoption: The UNL Threshold Has Already Been Cleared
The operationally significant figure is not the 43% overall adoption rate but the 89% of Unique Node List (UNL) validators, 31 of 35, already running v3.2.0.
The XRP Ledger requires 80% UNL participation to treat a software version as sufficiently adopted, meaning the network already considers xrpld v3.2.0 the de facto standard. Roughly 61% of validators running Ripple-versioned software have also upgraded, per the same data.
For non-UNL nodes, the upgrade remains voluntary for now, but the incentive structure sharpens once a related amendment is activated. Nodes that fall behind after activation risk losing network connectivity, a dynamic that pressured adoption during the v3.1.3 / Cleanup31_ cycle in late May 2026.
The v3.2.0 release formalizes the rebranding of the core server from rippled to xrpld per the XLS-0095 specification and delivers 30% to 40% lower memory usage across network nodes, a direct reduction in infrastructure costs for institutional operators.
The update also improves security, developer tooling, and network efficiency, building on bug fixes and improvements to permissioned domains and vaults introduced in the v3.1.3 maintenance release.
the XRP Ledger deployed its new v3.2.0 server software to cut costs and improve stability, but the critical on-chain amendment is stuck in the voting process
approximately 833 active nodes, only 43% have installed the June 15 update, while 51% are still running the older v3.1.3… pic.twitter.com/f1abBDD1ah
fixCleanup3_2_0 Amendment: The Vote Is Still Short of Activation
The companion XRPL amendment, fixCleanup3_2_0, is the more time-sensitive governance item. As of the report, it has collected only 17 of the 35 UNL validator votes required, 48.57% support against the 80% threshold (28 votes) needed for activation.
The amendment governance model also requires that support remain above 80% for a continuous two-week window; any drop resets the timer, which is worth noting when tracking activation data.
If fixCleanup3_2_0 clears that bar, it will deploy fixes for single-asset vaults, the native lending protocol, multi-purpose tokens, permissioned domains, and the permissioned DEX.
Those features arrived during XRPL’s 2026 amendment wave, which included XLS-81 (Permissioned DEX), XLS-85 (Token Escrow), Permissioned Domains (activated April 2, 2026), and XLS-65/66 (Vault Lending Protocol) – making fixCleanup3_2_0 a consolidation fix rather than a net-new capability.
What Ripple Node Operators and Institutional Participants Should Watch
The analytical question is no longer whether Ripple’s v3.2.0 rollout has sufficient validator support; it does. The question is whether the fixCleanup3_2_0 vote can build momentum from 48.57% to the 80% activation threshold, and whether the broader node population migrates before that amendment activates, thereby raising the stakes for connectivity.
We suspect the validator vote timeline is the more consequential signal for DeFi infrastructure participants on XRPL, since the fixes it carries touch every major protocol surface.
This includes vaults, the XRP Ledger’s native lending protocol, permissioned exchange rails, and token standards, activated over the past several months. Node operators who have not yet moved to xrpld v3.2.0 are running a narrowing window before the amendment pressure increases.
Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.
Neil is a professional cryptocurrency content writer with years of experience. He has written for various cryptocurrency websites to report on breaking news, and been hired by all sorts of cryptocurrency projects, to create content that would increase their exposure and attract more potential investors.
Ripple announced on June 29 that developers can begin testing the XRPL Lending Protocol in a dedicated environment, advancing a dual upgrade comprising two technical specifications, XLS-65 and XLS-66, that would introduce native, fixed-term credit infrastructure directly on the XRP Ledger.
This is pending approval by the network’s validator set under the XRPL amendment process, which requires sustained support of over 80% from trusted validators for two consecutive weeks.
This is not simply another DeFi yield layer grafted onto a blockchain. It is a structural effort to establish the XRP Ledger as a regulated credit rail for institutional participants.
It would require off-chain underwriting authority, first-loss capital protection, and fixed-rate loan terms that map onto bank and asset-manager risk frameworks rather than the automated liquidation logic that governs permissionless protocols.
@Ripple just published the full breakdown of the XRPL Lending Protocol credit infrastructure, natively onchain.
Single Asset Vaults. Standardized loan origination. Repayment and default logic enforced at the protocol layer.
XRPL Lending Protocol: How the Dual Upgrade Is Structured
The mechanism functions as follows: XLS-65 establishes the Single Asset Vault, a standardized pooling format that allows liquidity providers to deposit one asset type, such as XRP or RLUSD, and earn yield.
XLS-66, the Lending Protocol layer, governs loan terms, repayment schedules, interest calculations, and default conditions, all of which are enforced at the protocol level rather than through external smart contracts.
Loans under the design are fixed-term and uncollateralized, a deliberate departure from collateral-dependent models such as Aave. Creditworthiness assessment remains off-chain, preserving institutional control over lending decisions while on-chain logic handles lifecycle events once a loan is originated.
Losses from defaults are absorbed first by pool managers and underwriters – a first-loss capital structure that mirrors tranched credit in traditional finance.
Ripple said the design choice reflects deliberate architecture rather than a limitation. “This separation mirrors real financial infrastructure,” the company stated. “By preserving that distinction, XRPL can support a wider range of credit structures over time, rather than hard-coding one lending model into a single application.”
RippleX developer Edward Hennis has described the target as “real credit, not a DeFi gambling pool,” characterizing the system as regulation-friendly institutional DeFi with loan durations typically running 30 to 180 days at fixed rates.
All you have to do is spot and chill.
As we progress into H2 2026 we are likely to witness more historical oversold signals print for $XRP, such as the 2W RSI reaching its lowest levels of 34
Higher lows or lower lows under lower highs: all led to major breakouts eventually 🚀 pic.twitter.com/6N7WSYUwcp
On-Chain Credit Context: RWAs, RLUSD, and the Ondo Precedent
Ripple frames the lending protocol as the functional complement to tokenized RWA activity already occurring on XRPL. In May 2026, Ondo Finance executed the first cross-border, cross-bank redemption of tokenized US Treasuries on the ledger, a milestone Ripple described as proof that moving an asset on-chain is only half the infrastructure problem.
The XRPL Lending Protocol, if activated, would allow those same tokenized assets to serve as working capital rather than static inventory, providing payment providers short-duration liquidity and enabling treasury teams to generate revenue by lending digital assets under predefined terms.
RLUSD, Ripple’s stablecoin, is positioned as a primary vault asset within that credit structure. According to CoinGecko, RLUSD has reached a $1.5Bn market cap since its late-2024 debut, giving the lending vaults a liquid, dollar-denominated base asset with meaningful existing supply. The protocol’s activation would deepen RLUSD’s on-chain utility beyond payments and into on-chain credit markets.
Validator Vote and Ripple Price at Time of Announcement
The amendment entered validator voting following the XRPL v3.1.0 release in January 2026, according to multiple reports. As of the June 29 announcement, the vote has not concluded.
RippleX has applied formal verification to the XLS-65/66 code and is offering up to $200,000 in security bounties to researchers who can identify flaws in the lending protocol’s design or implementation before any mainnet activation.
XRP traded around $1.05 at the time of the announcement, down -8% over the prior week. The token had fallen to its lowest level since President Donald Trump’s reelection the previous Thursday, briefly nearing $0.99 in sympathy with Bitcoin’s movement.
The analytical question is no longer whether XRPL can move assets on-chain; it is whether the validator set will ratify the credit infrastructure needed to put those assets to work.
Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.
Daniel Frances is a technical writer and Web3 educator specializing in macroeconomics and DeFi mechanics. A crypto native since 2017, Daniel leverages his background in on-chain analytics to author evidence-based reports and deep-dive guides. He holds certifications from The Blockchain Council, and is dedicated to providing "information gain" that cuts through market hype to find real-world blockchain utility.